🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.