🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a growing chorus of countries are exploring parallel measures.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and networks are "robbing our kids' youth". A law could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a bill raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a related step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged parents to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a good foundation," stated the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, action is largely unfolding at the regional level due to national stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with additional time requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced measures mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some figures to copy the Australian path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Outside of the West, further nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in safety.

Even as this worldwide conversation continues, the steps of this nation and others demonstrate that states globally are no longer content to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.